This quote is also from my addendum (supplement) to my first report (continued from previous day's quote):
Please make us rethink this whole situation with valid data, not lies that work. Do not consider the fact of fireproof enclosures and fire suppression systems being on/in sections of the EBUs (Engine Build-Ups) in your calculations. They are only backup systems. The valid witnessing of leakproof torques at PSD by future (I hope) non-roller stamping inspectors should be a backup system unto itself, that is now missing, and should ensure the 0 AQL. See the Exhibit AM email for an additional Engineering contact on the leak-proof torque issue. I think you can see, by these emails and the (engineering specification) witness torque emails, that I suspected/knew of the unethicality of our QA management long ago, and was checking up on them, Don Quixote fruitless style, trying to undo the horrific damage they were doing, and have ultimately done, to our Quality System.
The Last Inspector