The Last Boeing Inspector
  • The Last Inspector's Blog
  • The Boeing-FAA "Working Together" Fraud Negating Boeing Airplane Quality
  • Boeing's 100 Year Heritage of Building Something Worse Than Required
  • Boeing's Vast Network of Fraud
  • Other Boeing Fraud
  • Troubling Facts about Boeing's Culture of Fraud
  • Jump Page
  • About/Contact Me
  • Crashes Because of Rollerstamping
  • What is Rollerstamping?
  • New Fraud, Same as the Old Fraud
  • Boeing Workers Agree: Only Fly on Boeing Planes if you Have a Death Wish

​
​​​

Daily Report Quote

8/24/2006

 

This quote is also from the 11/24/02 letter I wrote to Nicholas Sabatini, Associate Administrator for Regulation and Certification, to try and get an objective investigation of my report done for the public's sake:
​

 I should have been suspicious when (name), Senior ASI at the MIDO, told me early in the investigation that they would investigate my "specific allegations" in my report (I had not made any "non-specific allegations" in my report. In fact, my report was chock full of specifics!). He also said that they did not investigate what he termed "personnel problems." I felt that was not directed at me or my report, as I had detailed what any casual observer could consider crimes and corruption impinging upon the safety of our airplanes, not mere "personnel problems." Still, I was suspicious enough to ask if they could involve the FBI and Justice Department if need be. He was evasive, but eventually said that they had done so at least once in the past at the MIDO.

I had hoped that all I would have to do was to submit my report to the MIDO, and they would do the rest ethically, thoroughly, and with integrity. I was hoping they were the "one stop shopping place" that 14CFR13 seems to indicate, and would coordinate with the FBI and Justice Department as necessary during their investigation, making my further involvement with rectifying the corruption in the Quality System at BCAG unnecessary. However, I was horribly mistaken, it seems. Due to the apparent failure of the MIDO to fully investigate the items in my report, it appears the ball is now back in my court.

I had written my report as a "self contained" primer that I thought, and still think, could easily restore the BCAG Quality System by only doing an honest investigation and corrective actions therefrom. In the end, if the investigation was performed ethically and thoroughly, all corruption in the BCAG Quality System should be routed out. 

How did the TAD’s investigation of my report get derailed as described above? I don’t know, specifically. I only have suspicions that will ultimately need corroboration. A clue perhaps, can be found on the TAD’s website. According to the website, the TAD advances safety "by providing the highest quality (customer) service." Sending their customers to jail or doing anything their customers would not approve of would not fit in with that philosophy of "customer service," no matter how corrupt their "customer" happened to be. Another clue is, apparently, even though in the addendum to my report I requested the MIDO not to protect my identity if it would impede their investigation in any way, it appears that they may have intentionally ignored that request in order, not to protect me, but to use such "protection" of my identity as a convenient excuse in order to not investigate the more serious items detailed in my report, for whatever reason.

The MIDO’s attempt(s) to protect my identity by not investigating certain items does not make sense to me. When I agreed to let them protect my identity if possible after submitting the first part of my report, I was not told they intended to do so by only investigating items they thought would not give away my identity. If I knew they were going to do that, I would not have had them protect my identity at all. I had just wanted them not to tell BCAG outright that it was me that had submitted the report. I did not care if BCAG figured it out on their own via the items the MIDO was investigating. I specifically requested that the MIDO not protect my identity in any way in my addendum to my report to prevent that "process" again from impeding the investigation in any way. However, it appears the MIDO may have attempted to protect my identity again despite my request, judging by the meager list of items they confirmed in the investigation. Of course, there may be some other explanation. 



Comments are closed.

    Author:

    The Last Inspector
    Gerald Eastman

    Archives

    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2011
    February 2011
    December 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    September 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    June 2006

    Categories

    All
    Airbus-is-actually-regulated
    Airbus Must Be A Monopoly
    Boeing Centennial
    Boeing-chief-counsel-letter
    Boeing-continues-to-offend
    Boeingfaa-fraud
    Boeing Improper Delegation
    Boeing Production Cuts
    Boeing Quality A Shell Organization
    Boeing Quality Subversion
    Boeing Quid Pro Quo Hiring Of Government Officials
    Boeing's Legacy Of Corruption
    Boeing-spreading-corruption
    Daily Report Quote
    Doug Bain Letter
    First Blog Post
    First Letter To FAA
    Important Announcements
    Important Warning
    Inspector General Investigation
    Necessity Of Boeing Failure
    OIG Letter
    Sabatini Letter
    Safer Crew And Passengers
    The Evil Nature Of Boeing Management
    Thomas Nakamichi Meeting
    Unlike Boeing

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • The Last Inspector's Blog
  • The Boeing-FAA "Working Together" Fraud Negating Boeing Airplane Quality
  • Boeing's 100 Year Heritage of Building Something Worse Than Required
  • Boeing's Vast Network of Fraud
  • Other Boeing Fraud
  • Troubling Facts about Boeing's Culture of Fraud
  • Jump Page
  • About/Contact Me
  • Crashes Because of Rollerstamping
  • What is Rollerstamping?
  • New Fraud, Same as the Old Fraud
  • Boeing Workers Agree: Only Fly on Boeing Planes if you Have a Death Wish
✕